A Simple 3D Visual Text Retrieval Interface
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3D visual text retrieval interfaces are currently a fringe topic of interest. This paper suggests that 3D visual interfaces are fringe topics because of the complexity and abstract nature of many of the previous attempts in this area. In order for 3D visual interfaces to become mainstream this paper proposes that they must be concrete in the metaphor they employ, simple to use, and appear familiar to the average web user. In a set of two prototypes, AutoViz and NetViz, an attempt is made to fulfill these requirements. The prototypes represent the query terms one plane and the documents in a second parallel plane. A spring system is used to cluster the terms and documents into a meaningful structure. Document profiles are displayed to the user as they move the mouse on top of document representations. Keywords: information visualization, visual query languages, search interfaces, information retrieval. 1 Introduction Very little work has been done on 3D visual search interfaces in th...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it