La mort de Marlon Brando de Pierre Gobeil ou comment écrire le silence et dire l’indicible
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selon Maurice Blanchot « [l]e silence fait partie du langage ». Peu etudie a titre d’element de la communication, le silence en est pourtant une composante importante, surtout chez les enfants. Dans La Mort de Marlon Brando de Pierre Gobeil (1989), la problematique du silence caracterise a la fois la forme et le fond du roman. En consequence, il importe d’analyser comment le « non-dit », en constituant un lieu de signification, permet au lecteur non seulement d’anticiper, mais aussi d’interpreter le viol du narrateur – un jeune garcon denomme Charles. Pour ce faire, il s’agit de tenir compte des manifestations paratextuelles et intertextuelles, des strategies narratives qui prefigurent le crime et, en dernier lieu, de la description du viol en fonction du silence qui pese sur lui. Outil heuristique, le silence traduit la nature indicible de cet acte et finit par reveler la presence d’un sous-texte porteur d’une critique sociale issue de l’heritage religieux au Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".