Las jerarquías étnicas y la retórica del multiculturalismo estatal en San José del Guaviare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza las tensiones entre las jerarquías étnicas en San José del Guaviare y la valoración positiva de la diversidad cultural que introdujo la retórica del multiculturalismo estatal. En particular, describe la posición diferencial que ocupa la gente jiw, tucano y nukak de acuerdo con las jerarquías elaboradas por los “blancos” del pueblo, los tucanos y los funcionarios estatales. Las características de estas jerarquías permiten cuestionar tres reduccionismos constitutivos del multiculturalismo estatal colombiano, a saber: la presunción de la unidad en la diversidad étnica, la esencialización de la diferencia cultural y la reificación de la comunidad. El artículo destaca la importancia de analizar las percepciones sobre la diferencia cultural en procesos que van más allá de la formalidad multicultural que exaltan las instituciones estatales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".