Central and South-Eastern Europe 2014 (14th edition)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central and South-Eastern Europe 2013, 13th Edition 1 "Central and South-Eastern Europe 2013, 13th Edition" is a comprehensive survey of countries and territories of Central and South-Eastern Europe that covers latest economic and political developments.As mentioned in the foreword, it is published at a time of serious uncertainty in the region, and in the European Union (henceforth EU).Greece is battling with a severe financial crisis, and other countries in the Western Balkans, despite some improvements in the framework of EU accession, also have problems with high unemployment and corruption along with the financial crisis.On the bright side, Croatia has signed the Treaty of Accession to the EU and approved it on a national referendum.So, the region is experiencing both positive and negative changes.As already said, this is the 13th edition of a very successful series of regional surveys which has started in 2000, and is also published in the US and Canada.It is a part of the "Europa Regional Surveys of the World" series, being one of its earliest titles.It consists of four parts covering the latest events with insightful articles on main issues, substantiated with statistical data and information regarding institutions and key figures related to the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it