Direct Synthesis of 2,5‐Bis(dodecanoxy)phenyleneethynylene‐Butadiynes by Sonogashira Coupling Reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The synthesis of a 2,5‐bis(dodecanoxy)phenyleneethynylene‐butadiyne series with 2, 4, 6 and 8 phenyl rings is reported. Sonogashira coupling reaction, rather than the Glaser/Eglinton/Hay reactions classically used for butadiyne formation was applied. The molecular structures of all compounds were confirmed by 1H, DEPT‐135, APT 13C, MALDI‐TOF, FTIR and FT‐Raman analyses. The linear and nonlinear optical properties were studied in solution by UV/Vis, static and time‐resolved fluorescence, and by two‐photon absorption (2PA) spectroscopy. With the exception of the dimer, for which intersystem crossing is very favoured due to the low energy gap between the singlet and triplet states as theoretically predicted, the other oligomers present high fluorescence quantum yields (0.77–0.82) and large cross‐sections (up to 5000 GM for the octamer) that could be applied in multiphoton microscopy or nonlinear optics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".