MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1492548111

Théâtre populaire du Québec, acte 2 : Contestations

2013· article· fr· W1492548111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylvain Lavoie

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAstrobiologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On se souviendra que le Théâtre Populaire du Québec, créé en 1963 sous l'impulsion de Jean Valcourt, a tout d'abord été conçu comme un « véritable théâtre de répertoire 1 » ; objet étatique plus idéaliste que civique, la jeune compagnie, dans un dessein éducatif et culturaliste, mettait alors en scène des œuvres présentant une « valeur de révélation et d'élévation » aux publics estudiantins du Québec, mais aussi des provinces et États limitrophes.Le 16 janvier 1969, c'est-à-dire le lendemain de la mort subite du premier directeur artistique du TPQ, son conseil d'administration (Guy Beaulne, André Duranleau, René Dussault, Jean Filiatrault, Jean-Joffre Gourd, Jean Pelletier et Claude Pichette) se réunit, après avoir convenu d'offrir cinq grand-messes « pour le repos de son âme », afin de discuter de « son remplacement comme metteur en scène 2 ».Les noms retenus sont Paul Blouin, André Brassard, François Cartier, Jean-Paul Fugère, Georges Groulx et Jean Guy.Or, deux mois plus tard, évoquant Albert Millaire, Jacques Létourneau et Paul Hébert, on décide d'engager « un véritable directeur artistique, 1. Voir Sylvain Lavoie, « Théâtre Populaire du

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0190.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)→Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→