Utilization of Artificial Neural Networks in the Control, Identification and Condition Monitoring of Hydraulic Systems - An Overview
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div class="htmlview paragraph">There has been considerable interest and activity in the area of application of the artificial neural network (ANN) to hydraulic systems. The pattern recognition capabilities of the ANN has led to an early investigation in areas where the neural networks could be trained using signals that were at least statistically similar to those signals which the trained ANN would be exposed during operation. The dynamic and encompassing nature of hydraulic system signals poses more of a challenge to ANN training and implementation than one of only pattern recognition. However, in the past decade, there has been considerable activity and progress in the application of ANN techniques for hydraulic systems control, identification and condition monitoring.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper provides an overview of work in this area. The ANN has proven to be a valuable addition to the current existing techniques. The learned behavior capability is a definite asset in the control of the nonlinear, complex systems encountered in the fluid power area. Training is a fundamental requirement for the ANN and this is very often accomplished using a simulation model of the system. ANN based controllers have demonstrated superior performance when compared to conventional PID controllers although these controllers are often an integral part of the training regime or in system operation with the ANN playing a supervisory role. In adaptive control, the ANN can be used to replace the plant model where the ability to emulate or mimic a nonlinear system plays a crucial role. As well, the control algorithm can utilize ANN capability. Fuzzy based controllers also have an approximate reasoning or intelligence capability based on a qualitative description of their dependencies. ANN techniques have been successfully employed in a form of parameter adjustment to enhance the performance of these controllers. Condition monitoring is perhaps a more natural application of the ANN where the pattern recognition capability can be fully utilized in a “stand alone” fashion. Simulation models have been successfully used to train the ANN for fault detection in physical systems.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".