Temporary flightlessness in pre‐laying Common Eiders <i>Somateria mollissima</i>: are females constrained by excessive wing‐loading or by minimal flight muscle ratio?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large body size, small wings and relatively low flight muscle mass are general attributes of flightlessness in birds, but a general analysis is lacking when considering these factors simultaneously. Common Eiders Somateria mollissima are large sea ducks characterized by short, pointed wings of low surface area. Because females fast throughout incubation, they need to accumulate large body reserves prior to laying. During this pre‐laying period, many females cannot take off, and dive when approached under still‐air conditions, whereas males take off readily when disturbed. In this paper, we examine how pre‐laying female Common Eiders fit the maximum wing‐loading ratio of Meunier, the marginal flight muscle ratio (FMR) of Marden and predictions of a general model of take‐off performance (also by Marden). Wing morphology was recorded and flight muscles were dissected from specimens collected during the pre‐laying period near one breeding colony. In addition, take‐off ability, as observed during collection, was compared with the proposed thresholds for flightlessness and outputs from the general model of take‐off performance. The results indicated that half of the pre‐laying females exceeded the wing‐loading ratio of Meunier, although all females had values above 0.160, the flight muscle ratio below which take‐off would be impossible. We suggest that wing‐loading and flight muscle ratio interact in Eiders, with higher FMR compensating for excessive wing‐loading. Nevertheless, the model of take‐off performance predicted, with reasonable accuracy, the behavioural observations under still‐air conditions. Indeed, females that were predicted to be temporarily flightless could produce a specific lift of 8.8 N/kg on average (less than the 9.8 N/kg required to overcome gravity). In contrast, the average specific lift predicted for males capable of flight was estimated to be 11.4 N/kg. These results agree with our observations that female Common Eiders are at the limit of flight capability in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".