MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporary flightlessness in pre‐laying Common Eiders <i>Somateria mollissima</i>: are females constrained by excessive wing‐loading or by minimal flight muscle ratio?

2005· article· en· W1492764609 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIbis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWingLeg muscleBiologyLayingWing loadingZoologyStructural engineeringAngle of attackMechanicsPhysicsEngineeringAerodynamicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large body size, small wings and relatively low flight muscle mass are general attributes of flightlessness in birds, but a general analysis is lacking when considering these factors simultaneously. Common Eiders Somateria mollissima are large sea ducks characterized by short, pointed wings of low surface area. Because females fast throughout incubation, they need to accumulate large body reserves prior to laying. During this pre‐laying period, many females cannot take off, and dive when approached under still‐air conditions, whereas males take off readily when disturbed. In this paper, we examine how pre‐laying female Common Eiders fit the maximum wing‐loading ratio of Meunier, the marginal flight muscle ratio (FMR) of Marden and predictions of a general model of take‐off performance (also by Marden). Wing morphology was recorded and flight muscles were dissected from specimens collected during the pre‐laying period near one breeding colony. In addition, take‐off ability, as observed during collection, was compared with the proposed thresholds for flightlessness and outputs from the general model of take‐off performance. The results indicated that half of the pre‐laying females exceeded the wing‐loading ratio of Meunier, although all females had values above 0.160, the flight muscle ratio below which take‐off would be impossible. We suggest that wing‐loading and flight muscle ratio interact in Eiders, with higher FMR compensating for excessive wing‐loading. Nevertheless, the model of take‐off performance predicted, with reasonable accuracy, the behavioural observations under still‐air conditions. Indeed, females that were predicted to be temporarily flightless could produce a specific lift of 8.8 N/kg on average (less than the 9.8 N/kg required to overcome gravity). In contrast, the average specific lift predicted for males capable of flight was estimated to be 11.4 N/kg. These results agree with our observations that female Common Eiders are at the limit of flight capability in vertebrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it