Monitoring Large-Scale Location-Based Information Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring the state of a distributed virtual world is challenging for several reasons: 1) the distributed information must be gathered in real-time without affecting the performance of the information system, 2) in large-scale systems it is impossible for a single node to collect and process all the data, 3) the vast information must be filtered and aggregated according to what the human observer wants to focus on, and 4) the point of interest of the observer can change frequently. In this paper we present and evaluate a non-intrusive monitoring middleware that addresses these challenges by dynamically partitioning the geographic map (e.g., of the virtual world or the game) in terms of map objects and (expected) state changes. We assign a different collector node to each of these partitions to collect and pre-process the data, and forward it to a central monitoring node. Furthermore, we provide mechanisms to efficiently filter and aggregate location changes, the pre-dominant changes in location-based information systems. We describe a specific monitoring setup that takes advantage of the replication model that is common in many virtual worlds and multiplayer games to collect the data. Finally, we present extensive performance results that show the trade-offs between scalability, precision, and real-time performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".