MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493197064

El programa de atención integral al médico enfermo

2001· article· es· W1493197064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonio Arteman, E. Bruguera, Miguel Casas, Joan Colom, Antoni Gual, Jaume González Padrós

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMACIO PSICOLOGICA · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)ConfidentialityMedicinePopulationPsychiatryFamily medicineAddictionNursingPolitical scienceLawEnvironmental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health personnel are considered to be a group with a high risk of suffering from mental disorders, with or without addiction to alcohol and/or other drugs. Within this group, physicians stand out because of their responsibility for the health of the population in general and that of their patients in particular, and because they are, themselves, patients who are especially difficult to treat. PAIME is a programme created jointly by the 4 Medical Councils of Catalonia and its Autonomous Government (Generalitat) devoted specifically to treating sick physicians in a specialised and confidential manner, within a framework of a commitment between the sick doctor, his/her psychiatrist and his/her Medical Council, which, in the last analysis, authorises him/her to practise medicine. This kind of programme is quite common in the U.S., Canada and Australia; in some countries of Europe, however, they have barely become aware of the problem. The experience that is exposed here is a pioneering one in our continent and should be a first step towards truly healing the healers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFORMACIO PSICOLOGICASame topicHealth and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207