MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493441042 · doi:10.1186/rr145

Synaptic interactions of retrogradely labeled genioglossus motoneurons with substance P-like immunoreactive terminals in the cat: a double labeling immunoelectron microscopic study

2001· article· en· W1493441042 on OpenAlexfundno aff
PJ Gatti, KA Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology Division of Life Sciences, Korea UniversityDepartamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Santiago de ChileMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversidad de ChileUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueKarolinska InstitutetAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchEberhard Karls Universität TübingenUniversity of SydneyNeurological Foundation of New ZealandU.S. Public Health ServiceUniversity of AucklandNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAuckland Medical Research FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of BristolUniversity of VirginiaUniversidad de Santiago de ChileUniversity of Texas at San AntonioAmerican Heart AssociationUniversity of OtagoUniversity of ChicagoNational Institutes of HealthMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of TorontoNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeBritish Heart FoundationNational Science FoundationCase Western Reserve UniversityMarsden FundRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandUniversity of QueenslandNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPfizer
KeywordsElectrophysiologyPhrenic nerveMotor neuronDiaphragm (acoustics)AfterhyperpolarizationBiologyMechanoreceptorRheobaseAnatomyCalciumNeuroscienceMembrane potentialInternal medicineRespiratory systemChemistrySpinal cordStimulationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory ResearchSame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207