MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1493688289 · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1627169

Die Behandlung von bipolaren Störungen nach den Leitlinien des Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments

2008· article· de· W1493688289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. Giersch, I. von Stralendorff, W. Greil

Bibliographic record

VenueNervenheilkunde · 2008
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Für die Behandlung bipolarer Störungen wurden von unterschiedlichen Arbeitsgruppen evidenzbasierte Leitlinien herausgegeben, bei denen die verschiedenen diagnostischen Untergruppen sowie die verschiedenen Behandlungsphasen berücksichtigt werden. Besonders aktuell und umfassend sind die Leitlinien des Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT). Die dort gegebenen Empfehlungen begründen sich nicht nur auf den Evidenzgrad mit der jeweiligen Substanz, sondern beziehen auch Daten zur Sicherheit und Verträglichkeit sowie allgemeine klinische Erfahrungen mit ein. In diesem Beitrag werden die Empfehlungen des CANMAT aus den Leitlinien 2005 und dem Update 2007 zusammengefasst und kurz kommentiert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNervenheilkundeSame topicBipolar Disorder and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207