The many ways to regulate glucose transporter 4This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 14th International Biochemistry of Exercise Conference – Muscles as Molecular and Metabolic Machines, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucose uptake into skeletal muscle is primarily mediated by glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4). The number of GLUT4 polypeptides at the surface of muscle cells rises rapidly in response to insulin, contraction, depolarization, or energy deprivation. However, distinct mechanisms underlie the gain in surface GLUT4 in each case. Insulin promotes its exocytosis to the membrane, regulating vesicle movement, tethering, docking, and fusion. In contrast, muscle contraction, depolarization, and energy demand reduce GLUT4 endocytosis. The signals involved in each case also differ. Insulin utilizes Akt, Rabs, and selective actin remodelling, whereas depolarization and energy deprivation engage AMP-activated protein kinase and Ca2+-dependent signals. GLUT4 internalizes via 2 major routes that involve dynamin, but only one requires clathrin. The clathrin-independent route is slowed down by energy deprivation, and is regulated by AMP-activated protein kinase. In addition to regulation of the exocytic and endocytic movement of GLUT4, glucose uptake is also modulated through changes in the transporter's intrinsic activity. The glycolytic enzymes glyceraldehyde-3-dehydrogenase and hexokinase II contribute to such regulation, through differential binding to GLUT4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".