MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494107087 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-821

Abstract 821: Fusogenic liposomes: A novel therapeutic strategy to efficiently target and destroy prostate cancer

2014· article· en· W1494107087 on OpenAlexaff
Jihane Mriouah, Rae‐Lynn Nesbitt, Desmond Pink, Roy Duncan, Andries Zijlstra, John D. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPProstate cancerLiposomeBombesinCancer researchCancerProstateCancer cellMedicineBiologyInternal medicineReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in North American men. While patients have benefited from advances in androgen deprivation therapy, prostate cancer ultimately evolves to a metastatic or castrate-resistant state that makes it the second-leading cause of cancer mortality in males. In the past 3 years, new chemotherapeutic drugs with efficacy in advanced disease have been introduced. Yet their efficacy is limited by dose-limiting toxicities and side effects due primarily to suboptimal biodistribution - they do not target tumors directly. To overcome these limitations, we have developed a novel drug encapsulation system for efficient and specific delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to prostate tumors. The reptilian reovirus-derived fusion-associated small transmembrane (FAST) protein (p14) increases the fusion of liposomes to cell membranes. In this study, we combine these fusogenic liposomes with peptides targeted to gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) to improve the delivery of chemotherapeutic payloads specifically to prostate cancer cells while sparing normal tissue. A fusion protein containing p14 and a C-terminal bombesin peptide was produced in a baculovirus expression system and incorporated into liposomes. The targeting and fusogenic properties of the p14-bombesin protein-containing liposomes were confirmed using flow cytometry. These experiments demonstrated improved delivery to cancer cells in vitro (PC3, LNCaP), compared to non-tumoral cells (BPH). The specificity of targeted fusogenic liposomes was confirmed by knockdown of GRPR and by blocking with free bombesin peptides. We then used intravital imaging in an avian xenograft model to measure the accumulation and specific uptake of the fusogenic targeted liposomes in prostate tumors compared to benign (BPH) and normal tissue, and found a significant increase in uptake in GRPR-expressing prostate cancer tumors using the bombesin-targeted fusogenic liposomes compared to controls. As a further proof of principle, we modified a commercial formulation of Doxil to incorporate our p14-bombesin fusion protein. This formulation showed significantly enhanced cancer-specific cytotoxicity in vitro and increased efficacy in xenograft models. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that molecular-targeted fusogenic FAST liposomes are a promising platform for improving the efficacy of chemotherapies that should show enhanced activity in advanced and metastatic prostate cancers. Citation Format: Jihane Mriouah, Rae-Lynn Nesbitt, Desmond Pink, Roy Duncan, Andries Zijlstra, John D. Lewis. Fusogenic liposomes: A novel therapeutic strategy to efficiently target and destroy prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 821. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-821

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207