MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494297042 · doi:10.5737/1181912x1827479

Young women’s experiences with breast cancer: An imperative for tailored information and support

2008· article· en· W1494297042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Support in Illness
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerWork (physics)CancerMedicineGerontologyFamily medicinePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work was undertaken to provide a basis for determining the type of assistance young women living with breast cancer would find useful. In-depth interviews were conducted with 28 women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 45 years about their experiences with breast cancer. They ranged in age from 28 to 42 years at the time of diagnosis. Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis--"everything depends on acting now," "everything is out of sync," and "cancer invaded my whole life." These women shared perspectives similar to those of older women, but also held perspectives unique to being young, with young families and busy career lives. Many found services did not match their requirements and they urged the creation of services tailored to their unique needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it