Expression in yeast and tobacco of plant cDNAs encoding acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the course of a search for cDNAs encoding plant sterol acyltransferases, an expressed sequence tag clone presenting substantial identity with yeast and animal acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferases was used to screen cDNA libraries from Arabidopsis and tobacco. This resulted in the isolation of two full-length cDNAs encoding proteins of 520 and 532 amino acids, respectively. Attempts to complement the yeast double-mutant are1 are2 defective in acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase were unsuccessful, showing that neither gene encodes acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase. Their deduced amino acid sequences were then shown to have 40 and 38% identity, respectively, with a murine acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase and their expression in are1 are2 or wild-type yeast resulted in a strong increase in the incorporation of oleyl CoA into triacylglycerols. Incorporation was 2-3 times higher in microsomes from yeast transformed with these plant cDNAs than in yeast transformed with the void vector, clearly showing that these cDNAs encode acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferases. Moreover, during the preparation of microsomes from the Arabidopsis DGAT-transformed yeast, a floating layer was observed on top of the 100 000 g supernatant. This fraction was enriched in triacylglycerols and exhibited strong acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase activity, whereas almost no activity was detected in the corresponding clear fraction from the control yeast. Thanks to the use of this active fraction and dihexanoylglycerol as a substrate, the de novo synthesis of 1,2-dihexanoyl 3-oleyl glycerol by AtDGAT could be demonstrated. Transformation of tobacco with AtDGAT was also performed. Analysis of 19 primary transformants allowed detection, in several individuals, of a marked increase (up to seven times) of triacylglycerol content which correlated with the AtDGAT mRNA expression. Furthermore, light-microscopy observations of leaf epidermis cells, stained with a lipid-specific dye, showed the presence of lipid droplets in the cells of triacylglycerol-overproducer plants, thus illustrating the potential application of acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase-transformed plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".