Cris et chuchotements : la citoyenneté au cœur de l’enseignement de l’histoire au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cet article propose une interprétation divergente de la controverse sur les programmes d’enseignement de l’histoire du Québec. Il soutient que les opposants au programme se trompent lorsqu’ils affirment que l’éducation à la citoyenneté est une nouveauté. Depuis le rapport Parent, l’histoire devrait familiariser les élèves avec l’attitude et la méthode des historiens, pour en faire des citoyens plus autonomes, critiques et rationnels. Les auteurs de ce texte appuient cet aspect du programme, mais déplorent le rôle de l’école dans la reproduction sociale. L’article montre que ce programme repose sur un nationalisme civique québécois, et non sur le fédéralisme, et que certains historiens et sociologues critiques du programme défendent en fait un nationalisme chauvin. Les auteurs considèrent que la lutte contre l’oppression nationale des Québécois a plus à gagner avec la formation de l’esprit critique qu’avec la mémorisation d’un récit apologétique et qu’avec l’endoctrinement, quel qu’il soit. Enfin, l’article tient ce débat non pour le signe d’une tare propre au Québec, mais pour une situation normale qui trouve son pendant ailleurs. Abstract This article offers a new and different interpretation of the controversy surrounding the history curriculum in Quebec. It argues that the opponents of the current program are mistaken in claiming that its emphasis on citizenship education is a new development. Since the Parent report, the history curriculum has attempted to expose students to the approaches and methods used by historians, with the goal of making them into more autonomous, critical, and rational citizens. The authors support that aim, but deplore the role played by schools in social reproduction. They demonstrate that the current program is based around civic Québécois nationalism, and not support for federalism, and that some historians and sociologists who have criticized it are in fact proponents of a more chauvinistic nationalism. The authors believe that Quebec’s struggle against national oppression will benefit more from the development of critical thinking among students than from the memorization of justificatory narratives or indoctrination of any type. Finally, rather than viewing this debate as a problem unique to Quebec, the article asserts that it has numerous precedents elsewhere in the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".