MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494494416

On packing squares with resource augmentation: maximizing the profit

2005· article· en· W1494494416 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnit squarePacking problemsSquare (algebra)MathematicsProfit (economics)Bounded functionMathematical optimizationCombinatoricsEconomicsMicroeconomicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of packing squares with profits into a bounded square region so as to maximize their total profit. More specifically, given a set L of n squares with positive profits, it is required to pack a subset of them into a unit size square region�0�1℄¢�0�1℄so that the total profit of the squares packed is maximized. For any given positive accuracy ε�0, we present an algorithm that outputs a packing of a subset of L in the augmented square region �1 ε℄¢�1 ε℄with profit value at least 1 ε OPT L, where OPT L is the maximum profit that can be achieved by packing a subset of L in the unit square. The running time of the algorithm is polynomial in n for fixed ε.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207