Variations in maternal care associated with differences in female rat reproductive behavior in a group‐mating environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maternal care influences the development of sexual behavior in pair mating rats, under laboratory conditions. This study examined the effect of variations in maternal care in a group-mating condition. Groups of two low and two high licking/grooming (LG) female offspring mated with two males in a large pacing chamber for 36 hr. Sexual behaviors were scored for the first 15 vaginal-cervical stimulations (VCS) and the entire 36 hr. Low LG females spent more time mating, required more time to receive an intromission after entering the male compartment. They also received more ejaculations compared to high LG females during the first 15 VCS. This difference disappeared as mating continued. Males were more responsive to high than low females. No pregnancy rate difference was seen between the two female phenotypes, demonstrating that variation in maternal care received results in two mating strategies that are both reproductively successful under group-mating conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".