MULTICULTURALISME DENSE OU VIOLENCE MASSIVE: QUATRE SCÉNARIOS POSSIBLES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Devant leur pluralisation ethnoculturelle augmentant chaque jour davantage, les États peuvent recourir à quatre principaux modes d’action: l’asssimilation qui est une forme d’exclusion dans ses formes les plus violentes (monoculturalisme); la différenciation altérisante (interculturalisme); l’institutionalisation de type pluraliste (multiculturalisme); et l’intégration à caractère relationnaliste
 (transculturalisme). À partir du cas canadien, ce texte propose principalement de mieux définir ces grandes approches à la gestion contemporaine du pluralisme ethnique, suggérant notamment d’entrevoir le transculturalisme comme une forme de « multiculturalisme dense » donnant une
 direction normative à ce qui autrement peut demeurer un cadre surtout légaliste qu’il s’agirait donc de mieux approfondir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".