MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494778824 · doi:10.4000/rh19.3915

Une maison d’édition au service d’une profession : Victor Rozier (1824-1890) et la médecine militaire

2009· article· fr· W1494778824 on OpenAlexaff
Claire Fredj

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècle · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College Saint-JeanInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au milieu du XIXe siècle, le typographe-imprimeur Victor Rozier devient rédacteur et éditeur de nombreuses publications destinées aux médecins de l’armée. Ses débuts dans le métier sont ceux d’un éditeur engagé dans un projet politique : la réforme du service de santé militaire. Cet aspect s’atténue considérablement avec le durcissement de la législation sur la presse sous le Second Empire, mais aussi avec le passage de Victor Rozier à l’édition officielle. L’extension progressive de ses activités montre une volonté de dominer l’ensemble du secteur très spécialisé qu’est l’édition médico-militaire. Son parcours témoigne des permanences et des transformations que connaît le monde de l’édition au cours du XIXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècleSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207