Federalismo y tutela de los derechos en una sociedad multiétnica:: el papel de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo de Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMARIO I. CANADA COMO LABORATORIO CONSTITUCIONAL.- II. LA TRANSFORMACION DE CANADA DE ORDENAMIENTO BICULTURAL A HOME OF DIVERSE COMMUNITIES: EL PAPEL DE LA CARTA CANADIENSE DE LOS DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES Y LA CONTRIBUCION DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE CANADA.- III. LA BUSQUEDA DE EQUILIBRIO ENTRE IGUALDAD Y TUTELA DE LAS DIFERENCIAS CULTURALES. LOS INSTRUMENTOS CONSTITUCIONALES PREVISTOS POR LA CARTA DE LOS DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES: 1. La clausula no obstant, el principio multicultural y el de la accomodation.- IV. CONTINUACION: 2. La teoria de los inherents rights y el principio de autogobierno. RESUMEN El principio multicultural representa una elemento clave en la comprension de los cambios institucionales que se estan llevando a cabo; y la experiencia canadiense, si bien no debe ser considerada como un modelo, se erige en un importante punto de vista. Este articulo se centra en como la Carta Canadiense representa el punto de partida en la revision del proceso de transicion de un Estado multinacional a multicultural, y analiza las diversas clausulas de la Carta que tienen como fin intentar equilibrar la proteccion de los derechos humanos universalmente reconocidos con los derechos de identidad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".