MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1494828505 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-396-1_4

Tumors of the Pituitary Gland

2009· book· en· W1494828505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPituitary glandPituitary tumorsMedicinePathologyEndocrinologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anterior pituitary tumors are clonal proliferation of pituitary cells. They usually consist of one cell type, although some adenomas consist of more than one cell type. Pituitary tumors can be characterized by broad spectrum markers such as synaptophysin and chromogranin. Reticulin histochemical staining is useful in separating normal hyperplastic and neoplastic pituitary tissues. Electron microscopy is a powerful tool to help separate various subtypes of adenomas including sparsely and densely granulated growth hormone adenomas and different subtypes of silent ACTH adenomas. The major types of pituitary adenomas include GH, PRL, ACTH, TSH, gonadotroph (FSH/LH), and null cell adenomas. A combination of hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopic studies are the most comprehensive ways of classifying pituitary tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it