Anatomy education in a new distributed MD program ‐ prospects and challenges (LB28)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MD undergraduate teaching at the University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada occurs in a distributed setting, with 288 students spread across four locations in the province per year of instruction. Hence, UBC has the largest medical school in Canada. Although experienced anatomy faculty exist on each UBC campus, large class teaching must be performed using videoconferencing technology supplemented by small group interaction in the cadaver labs. The Southern Medical Program at UBC Okanagan received the first set of MD undergraduates at the Kelowna campus in January 2012 and is the newest of UBC’s distributed sites. Teaching anatomy in such a pioneer setting offers unique perspectives on anatomy education as is currently practiced provincially and nationally, along with salient lessons on the prospects and challenges of distance learning in an MD program. This paper reflects on the impacts of location, pedagogic methods and curriculum on the teaching of anatomy in this unique locus and examines wider implications for the anatomy education of future doctors in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".