MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495270126 · doi:10.7202/032789ar

Évolution géomorphologique du glissement de terrain et du marais littoral de Saint-Joseph-de-la-Rive, Charlevoix, Québec

2007· article· fr· W1495270126 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Louise Quilliam, Michel Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À Saint-Joseph-de-la-Rive, un marais intertidal d'une superficie de 8,33 km2 s'étend du côté ouest d'un promontoire qui s'avance dans les eaux de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent. Ce promontoire est en fait la langue de fluage d'un glissement de terrain qui, comme l'indiquent les données historiques, fut déclenché par un important tremblement de terre en 1663. L'avancée soudaine de cette coulée a créé une anse abritée, instaurant ainsi des conditions favorables à la sédimentation vaseuse. Une coupe dans la micro-falaise, à la marge inférieure du marais supérieur, montre que plus de 2 m de vase se sont accumulés à cet endroit par-dessus des dépôts glissés. Le taux de sédimentation local était de 2,7 à 7 fois supérieur à ce qui a été mesuré dans les autres marais de l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent. Malgré de grandes imprécisions, huit datations au 14C corroborent de façon générale la date du glissement de terrain. La marge du marais supérieur et la falaise au front de la langue de fluage ont reculé au cours des 25 dernières années à des taux respectifs de 1,2 m/an et de 0,9 m an.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207