MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495629897 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.067678

<i>In vivo</i> intracellular responses of the medial geniculate neurones to acoustic stimuli in anaesthetized guinea pigs

2004· article· en· W1495629897 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yan‐Qin Yu, Ying Xiong, YS Chan, Jufang He

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Hong KongUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsExcitatory postsynaptic potentialInhibitory postsynaptic potentialMedial geniculate bodyPostsynaptic potentialStimulus (psychology)NeuroscienceChemistryMembrane potentialElectrophysiologyReversal potentialHyperpolarization (physics)BiologyPatch clampPsychologyInferior colliculusNucleusBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, we investigated the auditory response features of the medial geniculate neurones, using in vivo intracellular recordings in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Of the 76 neurones examined, 9 showed 'off' or 'on-off' responses to an acoustic stimulus and thus were defined as 'off' or 'on-off' neurones. Among the remaining 67 neurones, 42 showed an excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) to acoustic stimuli and 25 showed either a pure inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP, 7 neurones), or an IPSP preceded by an EPSP (EPSP-IPSP type, 18 neurones). The EPSP responses exhibited a mean latency of 15.7 +/- 6.1 ms, which was significantly shorter than that of the IPSP responses (21.3 +/- 8.6 ms, P < 0.01). The IPSP responses also showed a significantly greater duration than the EPSP responses (208.5 +/- 128.2 ms versus 122.4 +/- 84.8 ms, P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences between the amplitudes of IPSP and EPSP (8.3 +/- 3.2 mV versus 8.7 +/- 5.3 mV). Of the 11 neurones that showed EPSP responses to acoustic stimuli and were histologically labelled, 7 were located in the lemniscal medial geniculate body (MGB) and 4 in the non-lemniscal MGB. Another 6 labelled neurones that showed IPSP responses to acoustic stimuli were located in the non-lemniscal MGB. With a membrane potential of above -72 mV, the neurones showed greater EPSP or IPSP to an acoustic stimulus when their membrane potential was depolarized. However, upon hyperpolarization to below -74 mV, the neurones shifted to low-threshold calcium spikes (LTS)/LTS bursts. In response to auditory stimuli of different durations, 'off' neurones that responded to the offset of the acoustic stimulus and were located in the non-lemniscal MGB showed different response latencies or deviations of latencies in addition to exhibiting different numbers of spikes, suggesting that the timing of the spikes could be another component utilized by thalamic neurones to encode information on the stimulus. Given that some non-lemniscal neurones are multisensory and project to the entire auditory cortex, the selective corticofugal inhibition in the non-lemniscal MGB would enable the ascending pathway to prepare the auditory cortex to receive subsequent auditory information, avoiding the interference of other sensory inputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207