THE CHALLENGE AND PROMISE OF CRITICAL PEDAGOGY IN THE NEW INFORMATION AGE: AN INTERVIEW WITH HENRY GIROUX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En esta entrevista Giroux explora las diferentes conceptualizaciones emancipadoras y autoritarias de la educación, destacando el carácter político de la misma por su posibilidad de conectar conocimiento, autoridad y poder. La educación crítica es entendida como resultado de luchas particulares, conectadas a comunidades específicas, a recursos disponibles y a historias, identidades y experiencias del alumnado. Giroux conceptualiza la educación como un desafío, que intenta llevar a las personas más allá del mundo que conocen. Así se posibilitan formas de conocimiento que hacen posible la extensión de la cultura democrática. Pero Giroux también analiza la realidad de la educación superior, afectada por una crisis política y de legitimidad, que dificulta el desarrollo de principios democráticos e impone términos instrumentales y comerciales. Ante ello, el autor reclama un papel activo desde la universidad para solucionar los problemas de nuestras sociedades, proporcionando al alumnado conocimiento crítico para responder a las tendencias anti-democráticas actuales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".