MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495739753

A Tip to Pre-Med Students: Don't Put All Your Eggs in the Science Beaker

2014· article· en· W1495739753 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael James Horkoff

Bibliographic record

VenueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractMedical educationPsychologyMedicineBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every year in Canada, over 10 000 students apply to medical schools across the country (1). Each of these applicants has a unique story to tell about why they’re perusing medicine as a career, but all of them are trying to figure out the best academic pathway into the program.  Arguably, it is the academic pathway that will provide them with the most successful career in medicine that should be of more importance. Undergraduate studies are a grossly underutilized resource by many pre-med students who seem content focusing solely on Science when in reality, the majority of what’s taught has little to no utility in their prospective futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.013
Scholarly communication0.0160.021
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0190.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0760.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journalSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207