Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under this somewhat unusual title, the article deals with a theme developed in several religious traditions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Shamanism) and taken up again by a few "secular" authors (Artaud, Jung, Proust, Romain Rolland, Maslow), the theme of a modified perception of time giving rise to a form of time "exit", an extra-temporal style of existence, a "feeling of eternity". It is as if existence could be grasped other than in relation to its ephemeral aspect, as it escapes time, or, as it is said, in its eternal contenance. According to religious tradition and to the authors, this "other" grasp of existence requires that we move from ordinary consciousness to another mode of consciousness, which they all apply themselves to describe. The article does not seek to account for the different interpretations of the feeling of eternity originating in the most diverse of disciplines. It seeks rather to put viewpoints and testimonies into a parallel plane, in the hope that they will be mutually illuminating and enriching, and that they will succeed in making more accessible to us an experience that is worthy, at least, of serious consideration, and about which our dominant cultural currents do not speak to us very often.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".