MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The hepoxilins and some analogues: a review of their biology

2009· review· en· W1495793224 on OpenAlexafffund
C.R. Pace-Asciak

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIn vivoChemistryInflammationBiological activityPharmacologyBiochemistryIn vitroBiologyImmunologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hepoxilin pathway was discovered over two decades ago. Products in this pathway are derived through the 12S-lipoxygenase/hepoxilin synthase enzyme system and contain intrinsic biological activity. This activity relates to the reorganization of calcium and potassium ions within the cell, and in inflammation and insulin secretion. Although the natural hepoxilins are chemically unstable, chemical analogues (PBTs) have been synthesized with chemical and biological stability. The PBTs antagonize the natural hepoxilins. The PBTs showed bioavailability, excellent tolerance and stability in vivo. In proof of principle studies in vivo in animal models, the PBTs have shown actions as anti-inflammatory agents, anti-thrombotic agents, anti-cancer agents and anti-diabetic agents. These studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the base structure of the hepoxilin (and PBT) molecule and serve as an excellent framework for the design and preparation of second-generation compounds with improved pharmaceutical properties as therapeutics for the above-mentioned diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207