Derrida, deconstruction and education : ethics of pedagogy and research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notes on Contributors. Preface. 1. Introduction: Derrida and the Philosophy of Education: Peter Trifonas (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto). 2. Applied Derrida: (Mis)Reading the Work of Mourning in Educational Research: Patti Lather (Ohio State University). 3. The Teaching of Philosophy: Renewed Rights and Responsibilities: Denise Egea--Kuehne (Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge). 4. The Ethics of Science and/as Research: Deconstruction and the Orientations of a New Academic Responsibility: Peter Trifonas (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto). 5. Archiving Derrida: Marla Morris (Georgia Southern University). Derrida, Pedagogy and the Calculation of the Subject: Michael A. Peters (University of Glasgow). 6. Signal Event Context: Trace Technologies of the Habit@online: Robert Luke (University of Toronto). 7. Dewey, Derrida and 'The Double Bind': Jim Garrison (Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia). Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it