MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495967600

Derrida, deconstruction and education : ethics of pedagogy and research

2003· book· en· W1495967600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Pericles Trifonas, Michael A. Peters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconstruction (building)Context (archaeology)SociologyState (computer science)Subject (documents)Philosophy of educationMedia studiesHigher educationLibrary sciencePedagogyPolitical scienceLawHistoryEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notes on Contributors. Preface. 1. Introduction: Derrida and the Philosophy of Education: Peter Trifonas (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto). 2. Applied Derrida: (Mis)Reading the Work of Mourning in Educational Research: Patti Lather (Ohio State University). 3. The Teaching of Philosophy: Renewed Rights and Responsibilities: Denise Egea--Kuehne (Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge). 4. The Ethics of Science and/as Research: Deconstruction and the Orientations of a New Academic Responsibility: Peter Trifonas (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto). 5. Archiving Derrida: Marla Morris (Georgia Southern University). Derrida, Pedagogy and the Calculation of the Subject: Michael A. Peters (University of Glasgow). 6. Signal Event Context: Trace Technologies of the Habit@online: Robert Luke (University of Toronto). 7. Dewey, Derrida and 'The Double Bind': Jim Garrison (Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia). Index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhilosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismFrench-language works237,207