Aproximación al mundo rural romano en el territorio de Carmo = Approach to the Roman Rural settlement in the Territory of Carmo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este trabajo actualizamos el conocimiento de la implantacion rural romana en el territorio perteneciente a la ciudad de Carmona. Del analisis de los datos actuales se desprende, por un lado, que el patron de asentamiento es deudor de etapas precedentes y, por otro, que hubo una colonizacion intensiva y bien articulada en todo el territorio. El analisis tiene en consideracion la importancia de las vias como elementos vertebradores del espacio y de los distintos paisajes del ager carmonense como condicionantes de los distintos modelos de explotacion agraria. --------------------------------------------------------------- In this paper we update the knowledge of Roman rural establishments in territory belonging to the city of Carmona. The analysis of current data shows, on one hand, that the settlement pattern is debtor of previous stages and, on the other hand, there was an intensive and well-articulated colonization throughout the territory. The analysis takes into account the road network as an important element in the spatial organization, as well as, the different landscapes of Carmona’s ager that determine different farming models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".