MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495973048

Aproximación al mundo rural romano en el territorio de Carmo = Approach to the Roman Rural settlement in the Territory of Carmo

2012· article· es· W1495973048 on OpenAlex
Elisabet Conlin Hayes, Alejandro Jiménez Hernández

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueROMULA · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsAssociation des Radiologistes du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographySettlement (finance)HumanitiesArchaeologyCartographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo actualizamos el conocimiento de la implantacion rural romana en el territorio perteneciente a la ciudad de Carmona. Del analisis de los datos actuales se desprende, por un lado, que el patron de asentamiento es deudor de etapas precedentes y, por otro, que hubo una colonizacion intensiva y bien articulada en todo el territorio. El analisis tiene en consideracion la importancia de las vias como elementos vertebradores del espacio y de los distintos paisajes del ager carmonense como condicionantes de los distintos modelos de explotacion agraria. --------------------------------------------------------------- In this paper we update the knowledge of Roman rural establishments in territory belonging to the city of Carmona. The analysis of current data shows, on one hand, that the settlement pattern is debtor of previous stages and, on the other hand, there was an intensive and well-articulated colonization throughout the territory. The analysis takes into account the road network as an important element in the spatial organization, as well as, the different landscapes of Carmona’s ager that determine different farming models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it