O Processo de Inclusão por Meio do Lazer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente ensaio busca trazer à tona o debate sobre o direito das pessoas com deficiências de viverem diversas possibilidades de lazer. Para tanto, é fundamental que a dimensão de inclusão esteja presente ao analisar a realidade da sociedade em suas variadas esferas. O lazer enquanto direito inalienável de todas as pessoas precisa ser tratado na contramão da lógica do mercado que o apresenta ora como uma mercadoria, ora como um mérito para quem já alcançou seu status e lugar no mundo do trabalho. As diversas possibilidades de lazer, como as atividades físico-esportivas, manuais, artísticas, intelectuais, sociais, turísticas e virtuais devem estar ao alcance das pessoas com deficiência, pois estas contribuem para seu processo de desenvolvimento pessoal e social e pode garantir processos de autonomia para quem dele participa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".