MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1495993305 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.109579

The alveolar type I cells: the new knight of the alveolus?

2006· letter· en· W1495993305 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Berthiaume, Grégory Voisin, André Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlveolar cellsChemistryMedicineInternal medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until recently our knowledge of the function and regulation of the alveolar type I cells has been relatively modest. They cover 95% of the alveolar surface and form a tight epithelial barrier along with the alveolar type II cells that helps keep the alveoli dry. It is also recognized that its special morphological characteristics are perfectly designed for efficient gas exchange between the alveolus and the pulmonary capillaries. Much more is known about the function of the alveolar type II cells, which cover the remaining 5% of the alveolar surface. Mason & Williams (1977) described the type II cells as the 'crenated tower' defending the alveolus. This concept has since been supported by extensive data demonstrating that the type II cell has multiple functions in addition to its traditionally recognized role in surfactant secretion (Fehrenbach, 2001). It is now well accepted that the alveolar type II cell plays an important role in fluid balance across the alveolus and is actively involved in ion transport across the alveolar epithelium (Berthiaume et al. 1999). It also plays an important role in the repair process following injury, since it can proliferate and differentiate into alveolar type I cells (Berthiaume et al. 1999). Finally, the type II cell is known to play a major role in immunological defence of the alveolus, by secreting various cytokines involved in the recruitment of inflammatory cells in the lung (Fehrenbach, 2001). By contrast, the function of the alveolar type I cell has been relatively unexplored because it has been extremely difficult, until recently, to isolate and culture viable cells. Furthermore this effort has been hampered by the fact that no molecular markers were available for definitive identification of the cells (Williams, 2003). However, a small number of investigators have now successfully isolated and characterized type I cells. Based on those studies, we now recognize that alveolar type I cells, like the alveolar type II cells, are involved in multiple functions essential for the homeostasis of the alveolus, such as transepithelial ion and water transport and the control of cell proliferation (Williams, 2003). In this issue of TheJournal of Physiology, Chen et al. (2006) describe a new biological function of the alveolar type I cell. To achieve their objective they have used the novel approach of isolating and characterizing the alveolar type I cells, and then applied DNA microarray technology to identify genes that are preferentially expressed. They found 327 genes that were differentially expressed in alveolar type I cells and annotated in the Rat Genome Database GO association. They then selected 10 of those genes to further characterize their expression in alveolar type I cells. Using RT-PCR they confirmed that 9 of these 10 genes were indeed differentially expressed in alveolar type I cells. Interestingly, they not only established a molecular phenotype for the alveolar type I cells but also evaluated the potential role of two of the 10 genes (apolipoprotein E and transferrin) in defending the alveolus against oxidative stress. They found that these proteins were expressed in alveolar type I cells and their level of expression increases in the lung after an oxidative stress (hyperoxia). Furthermore, their administration prior to exposing animal to a hyperoxic challenge reduces the level of lung injury. Thus, utilizing the powerful screening potential of DNA microarray, Chen et al. (2006) have been able to identify a series of genes that are differentially expressed in the alveolar type I cells, and have deduced a new function for this cell type. Although this is a powerful and exciting experimental strategy, it can be associated with substantial pitfalls. One of the most significant drawbacks of this technology relates to the reproducibility between experiments (Viemann et al. 2005). In fact, if we compare their data to those published recently by Gonzalez et al. (2005), where the same cell types (rat alveolar type I and type II cells) were used to characterize the molecular phenotype of alveolar epithelial cells with microarrays, some differences in the gene expression profile of the alveolar type I cell can be observed. Although some genes were identified by both groups as being differentially expressed in the alveolar type I cells, not all those found by Chen et al. (2006) were listed among the 52 differentially expressed genes identified by Gonzalez et al. (2005). These inconsistencies are potentially related to the utilization of different microarray platforms, the methods utilized for data analysis, and perhaps subtle differences in the methods used for cell isolation. To account for all these potential source of variability, it is essential that any DNA microarray experiment be accompanied by controls that validate the results using different methods (Viemann et al. 2005). In their paper Chen et al. (2006) have not only confirmed the predominance of these genes in type I cells by RT-PCR but also demonstrated the presence of these proteins in alveolar type I cells. Furthermore, they established that these proteins have a potential functional role in the defence mechanism against oxidative stress in the lung. As an experimental strategy, this paper may become a model for those exploring the genomic response utilizing DNA microarrays. The data of Chen et al. (2006) also provide novel information regarding the potential role of alveolar type I cells. It is suggested that the alveolar type I cells protect the alveolar epithelium from oxidative injury by secreting apolipoprotein E and transferrin, although the impact of pretreatment with these proteins on the decrease in wet-to-dry ratio (−30%) or vascular permeability (−58%) suggests that other factors are probably important in modulating the severity of the injury. Furthermore it would also be important to demonstrate that these molecules could decrease the severity of injury in other models of lung injury and if they are administered as a treatment rather than a pretreatment. Nevertheless, these data offer an interesting new therapeutic avenue to explore in the field of lung injury. It is becoming increasingly clear that the type I cell actively participates in maintaining the homeostasis of the alveolus. This paper suggests that it might be the 'new knight' which has been recruited to defend the crenellated tower of the alveolus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.013
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207