La globalisation de la sociologie en situation africaine: entre résistances et dynamiques de structuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé: La présente contribution porte sur la globalisation de la sociologie ou, du moins, sa dé-localisation en regard des situations africaines. Elle s’emploie à faire le point de cette dynamique à la lumière du paradigme du Grand Partage de manière à donner une image de la situation et des trajectoires de ce processus dans ce contexte. L’étude comprend deux parties. La première analyse les mouvements de construction de la globalisation de la sociologie par le biais de la résistance pendant que la seconde étudie les voies expérimentées par les chercheurs qui tablent sur l’articulation du temps local et du temps scientifique global. Abstract: The present contribution speaks about globalization of sociology in regard to African area. It examines situation in light of Grand Partage (developmentalism) paradigm in the way to discover orientations taking by this process in this particular context. The study is divided in two parts. The first one analyses the building of globalization by resistance movements when the second focuses on the experiences of African researchers who are engaged in articulating local and global scientific times or dynamics to build an original way of sociological practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".