Pengaruh Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) dan Daya Saing Terhadap Ekspor (Studi Pada Sektor Industri Manufaktur Indonesia Tahun 2004-2013)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globalization in the economic field has encourage economic participation between countries. Every economy in the world has the goal to master and compete in the global market. Export is one of the economic activities undertaken to market their products outside national borders. By doing so, export requires a driving factor, the driving factors used in this study are FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) and competitiveness.The aim of this study is to determine the influence of FDI and competitiveness against exports on Indonesia’s manufacturing industries. This study using an equations model analysis with Ordinary Least Square (OLS) from the first quarter of 2004 – the fourth quarter of 2013. According to the result of simultaneous test indicating that FDI and competitiveness has significant effect on export .Furthermore, the partial test results indicates that each variable of FDI and competitiveness showed a significant effect on export. Keywords : FDI, Competitiveness, RCA, and Exports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".