MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1496380983 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1379086

Effects of imperfect subcarrier SNR information on adaptive bit loading algorithms for multicarrier systems

2005· article· en· W1496380983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)AlgorithmRobustness (evolution)Bit error rateSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)ImperfectOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we evaluate and compare the robustness of several adaptive bit loading algorithms for multicarrier transmission systems, when imperfect subcarrier signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) information is used. In particular, we investigate the impact of the uncertainty of data-aided channel estimation techniques on system performance. We also examine an implementation issue associated with adaptive bit loading algorithms that use metrics related to the SNR. Although such metrics can be derived via closed form expressions, look-up tables are used instead to reduce system complexity, resulting in the SNR values being quantized. Thus, we examine the effects of SNR quantization on system performance. Finally, we present a technique for choosing SNR values in a fixed length look-up table in order to minimize quantization error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207