MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1496457065

Elke Winter, Max Weber et les relations ethniques : du refus du biologisme racial à l’État multinational, suivi de Le Débat sur “race et société” au premier Congrès de la Société allemande de sociologie (1910). Montréal, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2004, xviii + 214 pages

2005· article· fr· W1496457065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Régis Meyran

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyArtSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’œuvre de Max Weber, foisonnante, n’a ete, comme on le sait, que tres partiellement traduite en francais. C’est pourquoi l’ouvrage d’Elke Winter est le bienvenu, car il comporte en deuxieme partie la traduction d’un debat au premier congres de la Societe allemande de sociologie, tenu a Francfort en 1910, opposant notamment Weber a l’eugeniste Alfred Ploetz. L’ouvrage vise, si l’on en croit l’auteur, a redonner sens a ce debat, par rapport au trajet intellectuel de Weber et dans le contexte s...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.013
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL HommeSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207