MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1496651468

Swept Under: Reading the Stories of Two Undervalued Maritime Writers

2008· article· en· W1496651468 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David Creelman

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingMainstreamAudience measurementReputationReading (process)EssentialismMedia studiesStyle (visual arts)HistoryLiteratureSociologyArtLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyGender studiesEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid growing interest in Canadian Maritime writing, Susan Kerslake's Middlewatch (1976) and Penumbra (1984) and Lesley Choyce's The Republic of Nothing (1994) have not received the critical acclaim or popular success they deserve. Three main factors have shaped the reception and reputation of these novels: they were published by small presses, which entails promotional limitations as identified by Danielle Fuller; their style and mode set these fictions outside the mainstream of popular readership; and each of them resists the signifying codes that define the Maritime region, codes linked to essentialism, as identified by Frank Davey and Ian McKay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207