MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Adaptive Charging Algorithm for Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids

2015· article· en· W1496762464 on OpenAlexaff
Abdoulmenim Bilh, Kshirasagar Naik, Ramadan El‐Shatshat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energySmart gridComputer scienceGridElectrical loadLoad balancing (electrical power)Term (time)Scheduling (production processes)Load profileLoad shiftingReal-time computingAutomotive engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringElectricityElectrical engineeringVoltageMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration of renewable energy sources and Electric Vehicles (EVs) into smart grids comes with significant challenges. The uncertainty of the short-term forecasted energy from renewable sources increases the variability of the net-load in the grid. Also, EVs' charging could exacerbate the load peak in the grid if charging is not coordinated. In this work, firstly, we study the impact of the variability of renewable sources on the short-term forecast of the net-load in the electric grid, and a model of the net-load forecast error is developed. Secondly, a novel online charging algorithm for EVs is proposed not only to shift EVs' load from the system peak period to more desirable period, but also to decrease the variability of the net-load in the grid. Simulation results show that our algorithm outperforms the traditional scheduling algorithms which optimize the overall load in the system based on short-term load forecast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207