Réflexions autour des « Fronts écologiques » dans le nord de l’Alberta (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La notion de « front écologique » est traitée, dans ces paragraphes, comme une notion exploratoire. L’article tente d’appliquer la notion à un espace éloigné et inscrit dans une temporalité et spatialité totalement différente de celle à partir de laquelle il a été conceptualisé. L’objectif consiste à tenter de sortir la notion du territoire géographique et du contexte dans lequel elle a été pensée afin de montrer son aspect opératoire et applicable à d’autres espaces, dans une perspective démonstrative. Le front écologique albertain est un espace de confrontation horizontal, présentant des logiques écologiques contradictoires (extraction, protection) et vertical, où s’agencent des logiques de domination et de régulation relatives aux questions foncières ou aux questions d’usages impliquant notamment les Autochtones. Le cas albertain fait émerger, à travers la complexité de ce processus écologique, les composantes d’un cycle adaptatif qui n’est pas sans faire écho à la notion de « panarchie ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".