MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Canadian Operational Research Society/Société Canadienne De Recherche Opérationelle

2011· other· en· W1496873950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceLibrary scienceSection (typography)Web sitePublic administrationRegional scienceSociologyComputer scienceThe InternetWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Founded in 1958 and incorporated on 25 February 1964, the Canadian Operational Research Society (CORS) takes a leadership role in the advancement of both the theory and practice of operational research (OR) in Canada, and it represents the Canadian OR community in the International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS). We meet our objectives with our publications, Web site ( www.cors.ca ), and annual conference and by supporting a diverse array of local section activities. The society is bilingual and is also known as the Société canadienne de recherche opérationelle (SCRO).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.080
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0800.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.454
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.057 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it