MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497059835 · doi:10.1126/science.320.5873.174a

Following an Asphalt Trail to Ancient Olmec Trade Routes

2008· article· en· W1497059835 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Pringle

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyGriffinMesoamericaExcavationHistoryGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY MEETING > SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY, 26–30 MARCH 2008, VANCOUVER, CANADA ![Figure][1] Sticky success. Digging asphalt from a seep, researchers recreated samples of Olmec sealant ( inset ). CREDIT: CARL J. WENDT When archaeologists teach about the Olmec culture, they flash images of massive stone heads, sculpted for a sophisticated elite who ruled the swampy lowlands of Mexico from 1200 to 400 B.C.E. But a poster by archaeologist Carl Wendt of California State University, Fullerton, throws the spotlight on Olmec commoners. Once dismissed as simple maize farmers, the ordinary Olmec apparently mastered a sophisticated technique for making asphalt, crucial to sealing wooden boats, and they traded the valuable substance to others. This research will shed new light on previously invisible trade routes, says Olmec expert David Grove of the University of Florida, Gainesville. Because Wendt can distinguish asphalt from various sources, Grove notes, the work “adds a significant new ‘artifact’ [asphalt] to the small list of artifacts that can be used in the study of trade in Mesoamerica at 1000 B.C.E.” Earlier archaeologists paid little attention to asphalt, occasionally noting its presence on sacred figurines, tool handles, and potsherds. But during excavations at the Olmec site of Paso los Ortices, Wendt discovered a pit containing 250 kilograms of asphalt slabs. He wondered how the Olmec processed asphalt, what they used it for, and whether elites controlled its manufacture. To find out, his team studied thin sections of asphalt lumps from Olmec sites with a petrographic microscope. They noted even patterns of sand particles and impressions of decomposed plants, suggesting that these silica-rich materials were intentionally mixed in during heating to add structure to the asphalt. The team also identified and sampled more than 50 asphalt seepages in the Olmec region. Then they experimented, adding different plant additives and heating samples in clay pots over fires to produce an asphalt that was both flexible enough to apply to figurines and other objects and yet hard enough to resist melting in the sun. “We had a bear of a time trying to get it to that state,” says Wendt. Some samples were simply too watery. But Wendt and his team processed other, stickier samples in just a few hours; they found that the leaves of a plant the local inhabitants use to wrap tamales produced the best asphalt. The result is a very early example of materials processing, says Philip Arnold, an archaeologist at Loyola University in Chicago, Illinois, and it's “like a culinary art: You have to understand the properties of individual ingredients and how they work together.” Wendt's evidence now suggests that commoners produced their own asphalt, because the seeps were too numerous for easy management by Olmec lords. Moreover, Wendt's studies at the small Olmec site of El Remolino, dated between 1200 and 850 B.C.E., revealed that commoners extensively processed and used asphalt in their households. But what did they use it for? Other emerging data provide some clues. In January on the Veracruz coast, a team led by Alfredo Delgado Calderon of the Instituto Nacional de Anthropologia e Historia, Veracruz, unearthed remains of a 2200-year-old port and two canoes. The wood had rotted away, but the team found a 1- to 8-centimeter- thick asphalt lining that had once sealed the entire interior of the canoes. Wendt suggests that Olmec commoners processed asphalt primarily to waterproof their boats. That idea fits well with new thinking about the Olmec. For years, archaeologists had agreed that the Olmec economy was founded on maize agriculture, but recent studies reveal that the Olmec situated their villages along rivers and hunted wetland game. “Rivers are their transportation, communication, and trade routes,” says Wendt. “So to have effective watercraft is going to be critical.” Wendt is now studying the Olmec trade in asphalt, using chemical analyses to trace samples to their seepage of origin. This “provides a wonderful economic geography that has not been available for Olmec studies,” says Arnold. “It helps us to contour the Olmec political economy.” [1]: pending:yes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207