MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497063707 · doi:10.1109/oceans.1988.23756

Electronic chart display information systems: operational, policy and legal issues

2003· article· en· W1497063707 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P.W. Mushkat, C. Lamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChartMaritime safetyHydrographyMarine safetyOperations researchInformation systemLibrary scienceComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineeringPolitical scienceLawGeographyCartographyEnvironmental planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential exists to enhance marine safety through adoption and use of electronic chart display and information systems (ECDIS). The authors highlight issues related to ECDIS and its users. Features discussed are ECDIS technology, legal issues, and operational and training issues. The authors report on the first Canadian seminar devoted to ECDIS, organized by IITOPS (The International Institute for Transportation and Ocean Policy Studies) on behalf of the Marine Advisory Board and the Canadian Hydrographic Service, held in June, 1988 at the Marine Institute in St. John's, Newfoundland.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.014
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0380.025
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0140.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207