MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1497105202 · doi:10.2986/tren.047-0059

The Significance Of The Practical Theological Work Of Dr. John Mcnicol For Canadian Evangelicalism In The Twentieth Century

2007· dissertation· en· W1497105202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Warren H. CHARLTON

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremiseChristian ministryPassionTheologyOrder (exchange)The artsPrincipal (computer security)Work (physics)HistorySociologyReligious studiesPhilosophyArtPsychologyVisual artsEpistemologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of a thesis presented to Briercrest Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PRACTICAL-THEOLOGICAL WORK OF DR. JOHN MCNICOL FOR CANADIAN EVANGELICALISM IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY by Warren H. Charlton July 2007 This thesis will demonstrate that Dr. John McNicol’s significance for Canadian evangelicalism was primarily focussed in the Toronto Bible College but extended to the entire Bible School movement within North America. The premise of this thesis is that McNicol’s true significance is found in the two transcendent spiritual principles of Word and Spirit that lay at the heart of his practical-theological work. Attention is given to the testimonials of McNicol’s peers and students that are found in the primary documents in order evaluate the impact of his ministry from 1902 to 1954. McNicol’s writings and annual reports as principal from 1906 to 1946 were consulted to uncover his passion and policies as a Christian educator and theologian. It discovered that McNicol’s theology of Word and Spirit was uniformly applied to all aspects of the college. The Bible was

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.021
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→