MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497145666 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129197

Comparative study for improving damping oscillation of SMIB system with STATCOM and BESS using remote and local signal

2015· article· en· W1497145666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Electric power systemSIGNAL (programming language)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorOscillation (cell signaling)Low-frequency oscillationAC powerGenerator (circuit theory)EngineeringEnergy storagePower (physics)VoltageComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comparison of the performance of a STATCOM and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) in damping the inertial mode oscillations of a synchronous generator in a Single Machine Infinite Bus (SMIB) system. The effectiveness of remote control signal over local control signal is also examined. A damping controller is developed for both the STATCOM and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) utilizing rotor speed deviation of the remotely located synchronous generator. The performance of real power damping controller for BESS is compared with reactive power controller of a STATCOM. The effect of size of the BESS on damping the electromechanical oscillations of the generators is further investigated using EMTDC/PSCAD software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207