The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Review: The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. By Peter H. Gleick. Reviewed by Charles Dawson University of British Columbia, Canada Gleick, Peter H. The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1998. 307pp. Paper. ISBN: 1-55963-592-4. Recycled, acid-free paper. Fresh water is essential. In Water (Stodard Pub., 1999), Marq de Villier's noted if all the world's water were stored in a five-litre container, available fresh water would not quite fill a teaspoon (31). It is that fraction that is the focus of Peter H. Gleick's biennial report, the first in a comprehensive and timely series on this vital element. Initiating a process of monitoring and education Gleick's book spearheads change in water management, towards an ethic of sustainability and equity (33). Gleick is well known as a visionary thinker in the area of water use and he believes many current policies and practices are flawed. Gleick summarizes crucial issues such as the decommissioning of large dams (and the dangers of private-sector funding of existing projects), the paucity of response to global water needs (and subsequent loss of life and productivity), climate change, international conflict and water supplies and new legislation and policy. Each area is addressed in self-contained chapters, and a Water Briefs section updates recent research, institutions (such as The World Commission on Dams, The World Water Council and others), policy debates and (particularly relevant for this journal), an extensive list of water-focused electronic sites. Loren Eisely posed a question we might consider today: As for men, those myriad little detached ponds with their own swimming corpuscular life, what were they but a way that water has of going about beyond the reach of rivers? Gleick's volume provides ample evidence of the need for extended vigilance and action. One of the book's strengths is its amalgamation of much recent yet scattered information. He provides this information in a format with widespread relevance and appeal. This book should be required reading for planners, ecologists, financiers, lawyers, political science and engineering students and is also relevant for senior high school classes. It is well written and carefully organized, with case studies, references, tables and appendices illuminating the material. Gleick closes with a possible vision of water use and policy in 2050. Our choice and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".