MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497287125 · doi:10.5070/g311210382

The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources.

2000· article· en· W1497287125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationWater resourcesCommissionSustainabilityPolitical scienceFresh waterLawPublic administrationWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. By Peter H. Gleick. Reviewed by Charles Dawson University of British Columbia, Canada Gleick, Peter H. The World’s Water 1998-1999. The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1998. 307pp. Paper. ISBN: 1-55963-592-4. Recycled, acid-free paper. Fresh water is essential. In Water (Stodard Pub., 1999), Marq de Villier's noted if all the world's water were stored in a five-litre container, available fresh water would not quite fill a teaspoon (31). It is that fraction that is the focus of Peter H. Gleick's biennial report, the first in a comprehensive and timely series on this vital element. Initiating a process of monitoring and education Gleick's book spearheads change in water management, towards an ethic of sustainability and equity (33). Gleick is well known as a visionary thinker in the area of water use and he believes many current policies and practices are flawed. Gleick summarizes crucial issues such as the decommissioning of large dams (and the dangers of private-sector funding of existing projects), the paucity of response to global water needs (and subsequent loss of life and productivity), climate change, international conflict and water supplies and new legislation and policy. Each area is addressed in self-contained chapters, and a Water Briefs section updates recent research, institutions (such as The World Commission on Dams, The World Water Council and others), policy debates and (particularly relevant for this journal), an extensive list of water-focused electronic sites. Loren Eisely posed a question we might consider today: As for men, those myriad little detached ponds with their own swimming corpuscular life, what were they but a way that water has of going about beyond the reach of rivers? Gleick's volume provides ample evidence of the need for extended vigilance and action. One of the book's strengths is its amalgamation of much recent yet scattered information. He provides this information in a format with widespread relevance and appeal. This book should be required reading for planners, ecologists, financiers, lawyers, political science and engineering students and is also relevant for senior high school classes. It is well written and carefully organized, with case studies, references, tables and appendices illuminating the material. Gleick closes with a possible vision of water use and policy in 2050. Our choice and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it