MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497341010 · doi:10.1002/ett.2660

Performance of the Precision Time Protocol for clock synchronisation in smart grid applications

2013· article· en· W1497341010 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marthe Kassouf, Louis Dupont, J. Béland, Adam Fadlallah

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMaster clockTelecommunications networkBandwidth (computing)Smart gridClock synchronizationGridReal-time computingComputer networkDistributed computingSynchronization (alternating current)EngineeringTelecommunicationsClock signalElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Accurate time stamping is essential for reliable operation of the automation and control systems used across a smart grid. This paper investigates the performance of the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) for time distribution over the telecommunication networks interconnecting such systems. Distributed clocks are arranged in a PTP master‐slave hierarchy and can be synchronised to an international time standard with sub‐microsecond accuracy. Using Hydro Québec's telecommunications facilities, we investigate the synchronisation error that is observed using some of the latest PTP clock prototypes over a widely spread network. As such, field trials are performed by deploying PTP master and slave clocks in distant sites of Hydro Québec's wide area network (WAN). A thorough analysis of these trial outcomes is further conducted using laboratory experiments that point out the impact of different parameters such as the PTP messages rate, as well as the link bandwidth and asymmetry. Our analysis leads to important criteria for optimal PTP system design in a WAN environment using appropriate clock and network parameter settings. Improving the PTP clocks internal features is also part of this optimal design, since it is necessary for maintaining the required synchronisation performance in power grid applications running under scarce communication network bandwidth conditions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications TechnologiesSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207