MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497371089 · doi:10.3152/147154306781778812

Book reviews

2006· article· en· W1497371089 on OpenAlex
Cooper H. Langford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A popularization of science studies Get access The Art of Science by Castel Boris and Sismondo Segio Broadview Press, Peterborough ON, Canada, 2003, 200, CAN$29.95/US$26.95/UK£12.99, 1-55111-387-2 Cooper H Langford Cooper H Langford Faculty Professor and Coordinator of the program in Science, Technology, and Society Faculty of Communication and Culture at the University of Calgary, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; Email: chc408@mail.usask.ca; Tel: +1 403 220 5465 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Science and Public Policy, Volume 33, Issue 6, July 2006, Pages 473–474, https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778812 Published: 01 July 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it