MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497469375 · doi:10.1109/epeps.2014.7103642

Non-intrusive pseudo spectral approach for stochastic macromodeling of EM systems using deterministic full-wave solvers

2014· article· en· W1497469375 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Kabir, Roni Khazaka, Md. A. H. Talukder, Majid Ahadi, Elene Chobanyan, Aaron Smull, Sourajeet Roy, Branislav M. Notaroš

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceInterpolation (computer graphics)Stochastic processPolynomial chaosAlgorithmMathematical optimizationStochastic modellingGalerkin methodSpectral methodMathematicsMonte Carlo methodFinite element methodEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel stochastic macromodeling technique for the variability analysis of complex electromagnetic (EM) structures is proposed. This work combines a pseudo spectral approach with the Loewner matrix interpolation technique to generate the polynomial chaos macromodel from the stochastic S-parameters of the structure. The major benefit of the proposed strategy is that by exploiting the non-intrusive nature of the pseudo spectral approach, the stochastic macromodel can be generated directly from a small number of deterministic EM full-wave simulations. This enables the utilization of the robustness and versatility of conventional deterministic full-wave techniques without the need for the cumbersome stochastic Galerkin formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207